
It's all about the flying. Pull pitch, engines whine, blades eat air and the whole noisy mess launches into the blue. If you're not in it to get airborne, for that bird's eye view of your piece of the planet, I really don't see the point. ACP, TRE, TRI; it all just gets me up with the birds that much more. I recall six months into my first offshore gig, the boss asking me if I'd like to take on a training role, as I was rather keen and no doubt, driving him nuts. There were guys with bags of hours, but they couldn't be bothered. I figured as long as the training contributed to my time up, up and away, I was all over it. I received some training myself; how to teach, how to introduce and manage simulated emergencies, etc. and I was soon signed off as an instructor. You'll get much more flying if you've got some training acronym in your title, as you'll get the lion's share of the flying on most any offshore oil support base. Generally every time there's a new pilot on base, and turnover can be quite high on the rougher postings (I'm really not sure what guys expect when they get into this), they often require a fair bit of training, and depending on their background, they may have to fly the line with a training guy for awhile, so you'll get tons of hours trying to get new guys up to speed. Then there's check rides and line checks, and currency requirements to be met. If you like flying, get into training. Now there are training posts where you don't fly at all, like running manufacturer or company training programs full time in a simulator, which is a great job depending on your situation, but for now, kicking around the four corners of the globe trying my damnedest to emulate Indiana Jones, the extra time airborne in addition to flying paxs out to rigs is fine by me. I've now got bags of hours doing a myriad of different things and I quite enjoy passing on what I've learnt over the past three decades of wrestling these noisy contraptions up into the blue.
On a recent ACP refresher course in Vancouver, I was surprised at the amount of psychology that comes into play. Sure, you have a standard to maintain, and your job is to ascertain that the pilot is up to the task, and can safely manage a flight, as safety of the travelling public is paramount, but we spent a great deal of the course going over just how to determine where the deficiencies lie, and how to correct them. We don't get into pilot's relationships with their mothers, but we may try to help them understand that the mistake made was due to some poor cockpit resource management skill, like not prioritizing or operating single pilot when you've got a First Officer sitting beside you twiddling his thumbs. It was only a refresher for me, but it's always enlightening. Some of the techniques come naturally, as most of the guys in the room had been instructing for as long, if not longer, than I have, but I did come away with a renewed arsenal of tools to keep the standard where it's supposed to be. And safe.
As long as I get flying....












